Post Views: 34
1. The Supreme Court of India is poised to make a landmark decision regarding the interpretation of which act?
[A] Special Marriage Act, 1954
[B] Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
[C] Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
[D] Forest Conservation Act, 1980
Correct Answer: C [Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988]
Notes:
The Supreme Court of India is set to render a significant ruling concerning the interpretation of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PCA). This case has the potential to transform the legal framework governing corruption allegations that occurred before 2018. The court will consider whether the act of merely proposing a bribe constitutes an offense under the PCA, regardless of whether the public official accepts or rejects the offer. The hearing is slated for January 21, 2025.
2. Which of the following ministry has recently amended prison manual rules to eliminate caste discrimination among inmates?
[A] Ministry of Home
[B] Ministry of Defence
[C] Ministry of Law & Justice
[D] Ministry of Current Affairs
Correct Answer: A [Ministry of Home]
Notes:
The Union Home Ministry of India has recently revised the regulations governing prison operations to eradicate caste discrimination among inmates. This action is in response to a Supreme Court ruling delivered on October 3, 2024, which highlighted issues related to caste-based discrimination within correctional facilities. The modifications are intended to guarantee that all prisoners receive equal treatment, irrespective of their caste, and to prevent any form of segregation based on this characteristic. The ‘Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act, 2023’ has undergone revisions to incorporate a new provision, designated as Section 55(A), which addresses the ‘Prohibition of caste-based discrimination in Prisons and Correctional Institutions.’ This addition underscores the dedication to eliminating caste discrimination within the prison system and guarantees that all inmates are afforded equal rights and opportunities.
3. Which ministry has recently released the draft rules for the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP)?
[A] Ministry of Home
[B] Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology
[C] Ministry of Law & Justice
[D] Ministry of Current Affairs
Correct Answer: B [Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology]
Notes:
On January 3, 2024, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) published the draft rules for the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP). This comes after the Act was approved by Parliament in August 2023. The government has set up a feedback period on the MyGov portal, where stakeholders can share their views until February 18, 2025. There is a lot of excitement about these rules, as they are expected to explain different aspects of the law. The draft rules aim to clarify key issues. They discuss the responsibilities of data fiduciaries, the function of consent managers, and how to manage children’s personal data. They also describe the creation of the Data Protection Board, which will monitor compliance and deal with violations.
4. Which state Government has reactivated a 1978 Act aimed at preventing forced religious conversions?
[A] Arunachal Pradesh
[B] Andhra Pradesh
[C] Tamil Nadu
[D] Kerala
Correct Answer: A [Arunachal Pradesh]
Notes:
The government of Arunachal Pradesh is taking steps to revive a legislative measure from 1978 that seeks to curb forced religious conversions. This initiative comes almost fifty years after the original enactment by the inaugural Legislative Assembly of the former Union Territory. The legislation explicitly forbids conversions achieved through coercive tactics, inducements, or deceptive practices, and stipulates penalties that may include imprisonment and monetary fines. Currently, the government is in the process of developing regulations to facilitate the enforcement of this previously inactive law.
5. Whose order is required before police can take action for non-cognizable offences?
[A] DC
[B] Magistrate
[C] CM
[D] DGP
Correct Answer: B [Magistrate]
Notes:
In January 2025, the Supreme Court provided clarification regarding the scope of police investigations pertaining to both serious and non-serious crimes. The Court made a clear distinction between cognizable and non-cognizable offences, highlighting the necessity of protective measures for non-cognizable offences. This decision stemmed from a case that involved allegations against an appellant under particular provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). In the context of cognizable offences, law enforcement is permitted to commence investigations without obtaining prior consent. Conversely, non-cognizable offences necessitate a magistrate’s directive before police intervention can occur. This differentiation is essential for preserving the equilibrium between individual liberties and governmental power.
